Comments on: The yarn gets juicier http://www.girlfromauntie.com/journal/the-yarn-gets-juicier/ don't complain. what if this blog wasn't here at all, hmm? Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:54:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Juno http://www.girlfromauntie.com/journal/the-yarn-gets-juicier/comment-page-1/#comment-436 Juno Thu, 04 Aug 2005 19:08:21 +0000 http://www.girlfromauntie.com/journal/index.php/2005/the-yarn-gets-juicier/#comment-436 I noticed today that the Rowan Harris yarns have been re-named Rowan Scottish Tweed for this season. I noticed today that the Rowan Harris yarns have been re-named Rowan Scottish Tweed for this season.

]]> By: dyana http://www.girlfromauntie.com/journal/the-yarn-gets-juicier/comment-page-1/#comment-435 dyana Wed, 13 Jul 2005 15:09:00 +0000 http://www.girlfromauntie.com/journal/index.php/2005/the-yarn-gets-juicier/#comment-435 After working through ms.'s highly derisive writing, I'm finding it hard to believe a damn word she says. She's offering a whole heck of a lot of allegations and "facts" with out backing them up with proof. After working through ms.’s highly derisive writing, I’m finding it hard to believe a damn word she says. She’s offering a whole heck of a lot of allegations and “facts” with out backing them up with proof.

]]> By: j. http://www.girlfromauntie.com/journal/the-yarn-gets-juicier/comment-page-1/#comment-434 j. Sun, 10 Jul 2005 01:57:55 +0000 http://www.girlfromauntie.com/journal/index.php/2005/the-yarn-gets-juicier/#comment-434 Quite possibly. Of the information that can be independently corroborated, we've got: <ul> <li>- another company is in competition with her</li> <li>- it has a different corporate structure than whatever it is she's running</li> <li>- there appears to have been replication of the content of a customer service page of her website (defined as an "entire section" of her website)</li> </ul> It's almost as if she was just <em>waiting</em> for something like the HTA vs. HTTL lawsuit as an invitation to air her grievances. Or maybe HTA wound her up and let her go as part of its own little public relations war, without getting its own hands dirty. Who knows. Quite possibly. Of the information that can be independently corroborated, we’ve got:

  • - another company is in competition with her
  • - it has a different corporate structure than whatever it is she’s running
  • - there appears to have been replication of the content of a customer service page of her website (defined as an “entire section” of her website)

It’s almost as if she was just waiting for something like the HTA vs. HTTL lawsuit as an invitation to air her grievances. Or maybe HTA wound her up and let her go as part of its own little public relations war, without getting its own hands dirty. Who knows.

]]> By: Lola http://www.girlfromauntie.com/journal/the-yarn-gets-juicier/comment-page-1/#comment-433 Lola Sun, 10 Jul 2005 00:24:50 +0000 http://www.girlfromauntie.com/journal/index.php/2005/the-yarn-gets-juicier/#comment-433 Frankly, I'm having a really hard time following this saga. I can't figure out what is this person behind the referenced website so upset about. As for the fax . . . we have only her word that it was "obscene, abusive and threatening" - we don't know exactly what did the fax say that earned this description. Am I right to be confused about all this? Frankly, I’m having a really hard time following this saga. I can’t figure out what is this person behind the referenced website so upset about. As for the fax . . . we have only her word that it was “obscene, abusive and threatening” – we don’t know exactly what did the fax say that earned this description. Am I right to be confused about all this?

]]>